The message below was delivered today to those listed in the “To:” section below.
January 19, 2015
To: Employees, Directors, Managers & Agents
. DHS/CPS of Isabella County, MI
. Including but not limited to;
. Mark Stevens
. Vickie Block
. Dale MacDonald
. Mary Jane Flanagan
. Jack Sutton & Bob Lewis
. Wendy Yost
. Stephanie Smith & Melody Lake
. Risa Scully, Sarah Elizabeth Huyser & Matthew Hagen
From: Danielle Austin
. The citizenry at large, the People of Michigan
. We the People
. Theodore Visner
Subject: Child Protective Services Industry/Corporation
. Case No: 2014-0000000099-NA
To Whom all this may concern,
Approximately 180 days ago, grave injustices took place on your watch. You are being notified directly and independently to achieve your own full personal, commercial and criminal liability. Refusal to act in accordance with your oath is NOT an option. You are hereby put on notice. Notice to agent is notice to agency, notice to agency is notice to agent.
On July 23, 2014, Danielle Austin, was called and asked to be in court at 3:00p.m. that same day by CPS worker Stephanie Smith two hours prior to that hearing at approximately 1:00p.m. During that same phone call, Stephanie Smith asked Danielle Austin if she could afford a lawyer to which Danielle replied that she could not. During this same phone call, Stephanie Smith told Danielle that her children were being removed from her custody and placed with others and that Forster care for Michael Austin had already been arranged (prior to ANY hearing).
Arriving at the waiting area in the Isabella county courthouse as directed by Stephanie Smith, Danielle was approached by Tony Moses and he advised Danielle that he was her court appointed lawyer. Tony Mosses took Danielle Austin to a conference room where he pronounced the allegations being made by the state against her and that they were very very serious. (Three pages of unsigned and unsworn allegations)
At no point EVER was Danielle Austin served notice by Wendy Yost. Danielle Austin was only provided a copy of the summons and petition AFTER the 3:00p.m. hearing by a lawyer “claiming” to have been appointed to represent her at the hearing on July 23, 2014 at 3:00p.m. who later filed his notice of appearance in this same case some five days later on July 28, 2014. Tony Moses could NOT have received service on behalf of Danielle Austin on July 23, 2014 because he was NOT her lawyer until July 28, 2014.
Danielle Austin was not properly served, she was made to participate in court with ZERO knowledge of the unsigned allegations she was to face and ZERO time to seek competent legal counsel of her choosing all during a time her children had already been kidnapped by the state WITHOUTa court order signed by a judge. Stephanie Smith acted as judge, jury and executioner.
Wendy Yost “may have” served notice upon Tony Mosses before Tony Mosses had been introduced to Danielle Austin but this is speculation and does not change the fact that Wendy Yost claimed to have served Danielle Austin personally when she did NOT. This is PERJURY.
Page 1 of the SUMMONS attempts to define Danielle Austin’s rights but she was never served notice of the petition and notice of her rights.
“As a respondent you have the right to be represented by an attorney.”
This particular “right” was completely and intentionally averted as Danielle Austin was NEVER served notice. Even had Wendy Yost personally served Danielle Austin (which she did not), being served 3 min before the event is not PROPER LAWFUL NOTICE as claimed in almost every subsequent court filing made by the state which is intentional fraud and deception to avoid liability and the creation of a conspiracy against rights secured by our constitution.
Even if we are to set all of these gross and criminal errors aside, the 3:00pm hearing was on the petition. The petition sought to obtain a court order to remove the children from the Austin home (see Page 3 Item 8 of the petition) and this petition was denied.
Without proof, by court order signed by a judge, that predates the call from Stephanie Smith at 1:00P.M. on July 23, 2014, (of which Danielle Austin was completely aware of and participated in) Danielle Austin’s children were taken prior to any court order and this constitutes constructive criminal trespass and kidnapping under color of law.
Melody Lake claims that Danielle Austin’s children were taken “pursuant to a court order”. This is intentionally FALSE! (A LIE) Danielle’s children were taken prior to any court order and everything that happened after is predicated entirely in FRAUD.
Each and every one of you named at the top of this document are personally responsible for undoing what has wrongfully and unlawfully been done. Any and all monies that have been wrongfully seized and/or charged and billed including 3rd party fees and charges and child support and benefits intercepted will be returned and restored immediately and the state will withdraw itself from the unlawful interference with regard to the Austin family COMPLETELY and IMMEDIATELY on every level and in every aspect.
Every single thing that has transpired in this case since Danielle’s forced appearance in court without proper lawful notice and without the benefit of legal counsel is COMPLETELY & IRRECOVERABLY VOID.
FEDERAL CRIMINAL CODE
Your conspired cooperative actions to date are in violation of Federal Criminal Law, specifically Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242. Working together, above named, constitutes a conspired deprivation of INALIENABLE natural rights secured by the Constitution that you have each sworn an oath to protect. http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/federal-statutes
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).
It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.
This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race.
Acts under “color of any law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under “color of any law,” the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
In the upcoming suit for damages under Title 42 and the demand for criminal charges under title 18, it is recognized that some of you named above have not yet “directly” participated in these travesties (criminal events). It is up to you now to separate yourself and your personal, corporate and criminal liability by actively and immediately participating in the immediate rectification of these matters (This does not include KILLING the victims nor myself). Despite any internal directives (or the promise of immunity) that may require you to remain unified in this flagrant abuse of power and authority, you are strongly encouraged to seek your own individual competent criminal common law counsel.
Owning the courts and the police is NOT your entire concern.
Everyone on this list is required to REPLY via email with your full contact information and your rectification plans and stated intent within 24 hours of receipt of this notice.
ss/ Theodore Visner
De Jure Sheriff
Isabella county, state of Michigan
cc/ List Service Master List
Coming to comprehend what had happened to her, Danielle demanded that her children be returned to her via the only person she had any contact with, Melody Lake and here was Melody Lake’s reply via a text message.
It is easy to miss the significance of Melody’s claim “extra judicial testimony” here. Melody is stating how things were supposed to be done and not how they were done. Obviously, had the “courts” removed Dani’s children, their would be a court order predating the childrens abduction from Danielle’s home and their is NOT.
Melody would have been entirely more accurate had she stated, “I can not return your children to your care because this would constitute an open admission of guilt in that their was no authorization to take them in the first place.”
Once again, the state has become trapped by it’s own misdeeds. Doing the right thing at this point would cost a lot of people their jobs and the potential for criminal charges is amplified exponentially. Kidnapping is a very serious charge. The original wrongful and criminal acts are thus maintained at the direct continued expense (emotionally, financially and otherwise) of Dani’s family and her children.
Additionally I have discovered something else QUITE significant in Dani’s file. Without proper lawful notice via process service to Danielle, there were the following “alleged court appointed attorneys” standing by claiming to represent the respondents. Tony Moses was standing by claiming to represent Danielle, some other lawyer was standing by to represent the father of the children who was working out of town and HAD NOT been served and a man named Barberry was claiming to represent the three children. Three different lawyers were present claiming to “represent” the respondents whom all failed to recognize that no one had been properly served notice in the first place and AS REQUIRED BY LAW!?!?
Courts DO NOT PROCEED absent proper lawful notice to all parties! If and when they do, those proceedings are NULL AND VOID – AB INITIO (from the beginning).
Please explain to me again how it might seem fair to anyone, especially the children, to drag parents into court without notice after having ALREADY stolen their children, deny them their notice of rights, the opportunity to see and have time to think about the allegations they are to face and to find competent legal counsel and to prepare a defense? Does this sound fair to you?
Please explain to me how THREE lawyers allegedly representing the respondents=defendants (parents individually and their three children), a state/county prosecutor, a “referee” AND a judge whom all had obviously been working together to make the appearance and put on the show at a hearing on July 23, 2014 at 3:00pm despite the fact that NONE of the defendants/respondents were at all aware of the proceedings against them to begin with!?!?
In short, Danielle stood alone, without notice and unrepresented, facing SIX members of the Michigan State Bar Association all of whom were “licensed” to practice law that were working collectively and in collusion to strip and deprive Danielle Austin and her children of due process under color of law in a malicious prosecution scheme of kidnapping for profit and personal gain!
January 28, 2015 the following letter is received by Danielle announcing that the proceedings against her are NOT to be recorded out of respect for her privacy?!?!
This recording was made at the previous FTM meeting. This is the real motive behind keeping it confidential. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H68M1mo89cM
Brothers & Sisters, Please post the following message on your wall. We would very much appreciate your support! Be sure to include the text below that includes a link back to this page. Thank you and God Bless!
Looking for people to participate in a CALL campaign Monday (morning EST) January 26, 2014. Please make some calls. (numbers below)
BLUEPRINT OF A STATE SANCTIONED KIDNAPPING for profit in Isabella County Michigan.
How they do it and why they do it is immediately apparent in the linked article. Handicapped children are their primary target as the target family is already financially stressed to the max and they (handicapped children) create the biggest returns (highest revenue).
If you can’t get your mind around state sanctioned kidnapping under color of law, call these folks and ask them how and why they are doing it and more importantly, how and why they REFUSE to do anything about it.
(and yes… they ALL know)
REFUSAL TO CORRECT, CREATES RATIFICATION OF UNWRITTEN STATE & COUNTY POLICY
Dani has to go to court tomorrow afternoon (2:45pm EST) and is being forced still to participate in these BS proceedings. (I would like to ask the moderator to pin this post for a day is possible)
Peace and Blessings!
CALL LIST BELOW
Corporate Sheriff Leo Mioduszewski
207 Court Street # A
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858
Corporate Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette
G. Mennen Williams Building, 7th Floor
525 W. Ottawa St.
P.O. Box 30212
Lansing, MI 48909
Main Number (517) 373-1110
Facsimile (517) 373-3042
Corporate Isabella County Prosecutor, Risa Scully
200 N. Main Street
Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48858
Phone: (989) 772-0911 ext. 311
Fax: (989) 775-8413
Paul H. Chamberlain
William R. Rush
William T. Ervin
Mark H. Duthie
Corporate Department of Human Services
Social Services Organization
Address: 1919 Parkland Drive, Mount Pleasant, MI 48858
Corporate DHS worker (public Servant) Melody Lake
Office (989) 772-8400
Cell (989) 941-5014
Michigan State Police Gary Green
Phone: (989) 773-5951
February 11, 2015 UPDATE
JUDGE In Dani’s Case Is Caught LYING In Open Court!
Here is the link to the entire audio of the hearing.