Archive for May, 2015

The following email was sent to the following email addresses.
sheriffleo@isabellacounty.org
tellis@isabellacounty.org
dheugel@isabellacounty.org
dpatterson@isabellacounty.org
office@ballardcourtservices.com
dking@trottlaw.com
tjvisner@gmail.com
pao@isabellacounty.org
subject: Fraudulent Sheriff Sale Conducted by the Isabella County Sheriff Department.
____________________________________________
ATTENTION – ISABELLA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
ATTENTION – TROT & TROT
ATTENTION – DONALD J KING
ATTENTION – ISABELLA COUNTY COURT

MERS, or Mortgage Electronic Registration System is not a lender and thus can never be a mortgagee and thus can never foreclose on nor assign any claim to real property as they have never been a legitimate holder in due course.

Mortgagee

Without investigation as to the legitimacy of the request to conduct a sheriff sale, you are participating in FRAUD either through intent or willful ignorance.

Based upon the fraudulent Sheriff Sale, you are now attempting to further this FRAUD by and through application of summary proceedings to fraudulently evict. (Case File: 15912 LT)  Surprised you didn’t just send Steinert over!

Please be advised that these are not my opinions but rather stated facts. All that you need to do to verify is to discover the nature of and licensing limitations of MERS.

I would suggest that you nullify the sheriff sale and inform the court of the fraud that has occurred and have canceled (administratively close) the summary proceedings and inform me that the hearing scheduled for June 4, 2015 at 11:00am has been canceled.

Also take notice that any alleged mortgage given by Kathy Smith with regard to the property described in the notice below is nonexistent and NO foreclosure sale on this property is possible absent fraud.

You have been noticed. Notice to agent is notice to agency, notice to agency is notice to agent.

Ted Visner
(989) 954-2814

Notice of Sale_002

Advertisements

sdsf dgfg

Yesterday I, (Ted Visner), was SERVED.

Isabella county Michigan, unable to formalize any legitimate criminal charges against me and unwilling and unable to defend itself against the criminal allegations I have levied against it, it’s alleged officials and it’s alleged sheriff department is now fraudulently moving to evict me from my property in Isabella county in another attempt to silence me after conducting a secret and fraudulent sheriff’s sale of my property at some point in November 2014.

Many of you already know that I have not made a mortgage payment on my property in over six years but may be unaware of the reasons behind that decision. Our loan was a partially funded construction loan that stopped funding when Countrywide went out of business. Countrywide had funded our construction loan to approximately 45% leaving our home approximately 45% complete and now subject to damage from the elements.

Countrywide claimed to have sold our construction loan to Bank of America and also claimed that BOA would fund the remainder for our home’s completion. Instead, Countrywide sold our loan to BOA as a fully conventional and fully conforming loan rather than the partially funded construction loan that it was, leaving us holding the bag with a partial home that we could not sell, refinance, insure or finish.

Loan modifications do not exist for construction loans and our home owner’s insurance shot up to over $7,000 per month making it instantly unavailable. With a partially completed home that we could not sell, refinance etc., we were also ineligible for any type of loan modification. The reason the Insurance jumped to over $7k per month was because the insurance company knew that a fire loss was our only way out.

The fraudulent conveyance of the mortgage from Countrywide to BOA paralyzed us and both Countrywide and BOA have been fully aware of this for the past six years. Instead of commencing any foreclosure, they simply waited for us to vacate so that they could assume possession without resistance. At least once a month over the past six years the vultures circled and took pictures of our property as they expected us to simply walk away knowing they had no grounds to foreclose.

The home itself is over 8,860 square feet, (about the size of four average homes). Although this may sound (and would be) extravagant as a personal property, it’s intended finished use was to be that of a Bed and Breakfast style shelter for battered women and children.

In December 2009, my family bought another home in Mount Pleasant Michigan, also in Isabella county, which was to serve as a more comfortable and less stressful dwelling for my family while the issues with Countrywide and BOA could be resolved. This home, located at 829 E Walton Rd in Mount Pleasant was purchased on an 18 month land contract from Shelly Sweet. Shelly Sweet was employed by the Isabella county sheriff department and told her friends and coworkers that she had bad tenants (my family) that were trashing the house (a lie) and although we had made all payments she claimed that we had not (another lie) and convinced other members of the sheriff department to perform an unlawful eviction and property seizure completely outside the courts and due process which they did, taking both our home and the contents of our home absent any lawful grounds or authority. When my family was out of town over the weekend just prior to Monday September 27, 2010, Sweet convinced her friends and coworkers that we had abandoned both the real and personal property and our place was completely looted that weekend by police and others so that she could transfer possession to an unknown third party and on Monday September 27, 2010 I was kidnapped and thrown in jail by Isabella county sheriff deputy Clinton Steinert for calling 911 (managed by Isabella county sheriff department) to report the crimes of the Isabella county sheriff department and deputy Steinert.

The Isabella county sheriff department, the Michigan State Police, the Department of Justice, The US Marshal’s Office, the FBI, the Michigan Attorney General and the Isabella county Baord of Commissioners all refused to take our criminal complaints against the Isabella county sheriff department.

When trying to report the crimes of the sheriff department to the Michigan State Police, they told me that my allegations were too hard to believe, called me a liar and instead created a police report naming the MSP as the victim of me and implied that I was violent.

After our Mount Pleasant home and the majority of it’s contents at 829 E Walton Rd were stolen by the sheriff department, we retreated back to our unfinished home at 7287 W Fremont Rd in Blanchard, Michigan.

Suit was filed in Isabella county and was heard by alleged chief judge, Paul Chamberlain. After intentionally wasting approximately 2.5 years of our time and financial resources, Paul dismissed all the defendants in the case that basically consisted of every alleged official in Isabella county but not before we had earned an ironclad default judgment against one of the civilian defendants, Robert Wheeler. Left holding the bag for the entire county’s participation in the theft of our home and it’s contents would have led to redress but instead, Paul Chamberlain heard Wheeler’s motion to set aside the default against him and motion to dismiss him from the case entirely after the court ordered close of dispositive motions and granted both while violating every rule in the book to prevent Wheeler from becoming our star witness against the county.

A timely appeal was filed in pro per. The Michigan Appellate Court struck my 60+ page appellate brief for it not conforming to the format required of legal professionals (lawyers) and then summarily dismissed my appeal for not having a brief to prevent my appeal being heard at the appellate court level creating complicity at the appellate court level.

These events taught me that the system was flawed and completely engaged in a sole purpose of “Self-Preservation” with no regard for either the Constitution nor the laws of Michigan. These events taught me that the courts were working together to stifle large liability claims against the state.

These events and others have led me to become very familiar with the laws of Michigan and the Michigan Court Rules. Only after learning the laws and rules of Michigan is it discoverable that law enforcement officers, lawyers and judges do not abide by them what so ever while using the same laws and rules to clobber everyone else over the head as if we are all completely ignorant.

Once again I am being subjected to the state acting only to enforce bank fraud and corporate interests even after I having publicly removed my consent to be governed by these same criminals. I do not recognize the authority of the county sheriff department nor their presumed authority to fraudulently conduct a sheriff sale of my property as I have personally witnessed their crimes and continuing crimes. I do not recognize the authority of the prosecutor’s office in Isabella county because I have personally witnessed their crimes and their willful participation in continuing crimes. I have personally witnessed and recorded judges of this county lying on the official transcripts in effort to protect themselves and their own self interests. I have seen, documented and fully proven the Mount Pleasant Police (Sabuda) using fraudulently created sworn information without any firsthand knowledge (a 15 year felony perjury) to kidnap, charge, convict and sentence innocent people with the court’s full knowledge and complicity of the felony perjury in the Donald Brewczynski case.

I have personally seen alleged chief judge Paul Chamberlain order the county’s paid security force acting as court bailiffs to steal my personal property as I sat in the gallery as a peaceful observer, robbing me of both my personal property and my ability to obtain audio evidence of his personal involvement in the sentencing of an innocent man on a perjured sworn information.

I have seen too much and I have come to know too much and therefore have become a threat to the usurped authority of the state and to what the state relies upon, the Public Trust.

I have been marginalized, slandered, libeled, criminalized and scandalized in every way imaginable for my stance against the criminal activities perpetrated and conducted by these alleged authorities.

In July 2014 and out of further retaliation against me, Isabella county social workers kidnapped my girlfriend’s, (Danielle Austin) three minor children without order of the court on bogus allegations after she had gone to the state for temporary assistance. In further retaliation and despite court ordered visitation, visitation has been intentionally scheduled by social worker Shaun Hutchins to occur at times when it is physically impossible for the children to attend because they are in school intentionally alienating Danielle and her children and intentionally working to destroy the parent child bonds while telling the children that their mother is not interested in seeing them (A f-ing huge lie!).

After recording judges and prosecutors lying in court while violating Michigan laws on the record and having these events posted to YouTube, I have seen alleged chief judge (judicial terrorist) Paul Chamberlain create an “administrative rule” in accordance with Michigan Court Rule MCR 8.112 intended only for internal management of the court and under an imagined and delusional authority created by MCR 8.115, and force it upon the people as if it were law using contempt charges for enforcement to completely block any and all future attempts of anyone to record judicial crimes and judicial misconduct. This was Paul Chamberlain’s official response to posted proof of judicial misconduct in the Isabella county courts on YouTube. (News articles in both the Morning Sun and CM Life.)

001a

http://www.cm-life.com/article/2015/04/courtroom-cell-ban

http://www.cm-life.com/article/2015/02/isabella-county-trial-court-to-adopt-new-policy-prohibiting-cell-phones

I have seen, proven and demonstrated the Michigan Supreme Court’s complicity in the conspired intentional deprivation of due process rights under color of law with regard to trapping respondent parents into a jurisdiction wrongfully assumed and criminally maintained through MCR 3.920(H) which preemptively and completely unconstitutionally strips all Michigan parents involved with CPS of their due process rights which ensures the state’s victory over these respondent parents and their children while intentionally destroying Michigan families while profiting financially and otherwise from the same.

MCR 3.920(H) pictured below

law_001

I have seen these same people intentionally misspell my name on summonses for jury duty to prevent my participation and have sworn testimony of others that have attested to the fact that they were essentially barred and refused jury duty for admitting to being friends with me.

In summary, I have witnessed enough criminal activities personally that has forced me to withdraw any and all implied consent to be governed by these proven criminals acting with usurped authority serving and working only to obstruct justice under color of law for their own personal gain.

I have publicly announced my declaration of independence form both my county and state governments and refuse to acknowledged any of their implied authority over me and/or my property. This includes but is not limited to denying their presumed authority to settle any and all alleged property disputes between myself, my family and others.

As a willing conductor of crime and frauds against myself and my family in the past, it is understood that the alleged sheriff and the department of sheriff will not only refuse to help my family fighting these frauds but rather continue to willingly participate in them while working to cover and conceal others.

The alleged sheriff sale of my home located at 7287 W Fremont in Blanchard Michigan in November 2014 was fraudulent and any attempt to enforce that fraudulent sale and the fraudulent eviction proceedings (File No: 15912 LT) related to that fraudulent sale by the fraudulent courts, judges and other actors of this county will be met with firm resistance.

I have continued to retreat to every extent that I am physically able and with the knowledge that redress is not at all possible in the courts, refuse to retreat any further.

Ted Visner
(989) 954-2814

Why am I afraid?

Isabella County Chief Judge Paul Chamberlain
Paul Chamberlain is the alleged chief judge in Isabella county Michigan but from what I have witnessed and observed personally, his title would be more accurate if it were “Chief Judicial Terrorist”.

In addition to dismissing my action against the county when the sheriff department and Paul Chamberlain’s friends and coworkers at the sheriff department were implicated in the theft of my family’s home and it’s contents in September 2010 completely absent any and all due process, Paul Chamberlain ordered the theft of my personal property right in the courtroom when I was trying to advocate for another victim of the police, prosecution and the courts in central Michigan when he ordered a court bailiff to steal my personal electronic devices, namely my cell phone and digital audio recorder. His act not only deprived me of my personal property without any due process but also barred me from the exercise of my 1st Amendment rights.

Additionally, Paul has recently created legislation through his creation of administrative policy in Isabella county that he intends to enforce of the people of Michigan using contempt of court to fine and imprison offenders of his policy/legislation. This “Policy/Law” is in direct violation of MCR 8.115. This Michigan Court Rule allows a chief judge to create policy for the administration of court staff and court officers only but Paul has exempted the staff including court officer lawyers and attorneys (BAR Members). Not only is Paul violating Michigan Laws and the Michigan Court Rules, he is basically doing whatever the hell he wants.

Isabella County Judge William T. Ervin
Alleged judge Ervin has established and is practicing a policy that allows a “Summons to Appear” (command of the court) to be rubber stamped in his name. These rubber stamped and sealed summonses are being used to get respondent parents into court on the same exact day the summonses are created in violation of the Michigan Court Rules and absent any judicial review.

Isabella County Judge Mark Duthie
Alleged judge and allegedly honorable Mark Duthie lied in court on February 10, 2015 in the Danielle Austin case. No: 2014-0000000099-NA, this case is public and can be viewed and copied by anyone wanting to verify my allegations against Mark. In the same case and at the same hearing, Mark Duthie “ordered by appointment” an attorney forcing representation upon Danielle Austin in violation of MCR 3.915(B)(1)(b) and additionally in violation of the Article 1 § 13 of the Michigan Constitution after refusing to confirm that he was operating under his judicial oath and bond.

visner 4 sheriff

Dear Isabella County Prosecuting Attorney, Risa Scully

This is completely wrong on EVERY level.

KIDNAPPING is a CRIME!

Kidnapping me while I was trying to report state and federal crimes being carried out by your corporate police was one thing… kidnapping three children and keeping them from their mother while attempting to criminalize her to get to me or attempting to make me lash out or be violent is completely foul and absolutely disgusting.

I don’t care what you think about me personally or otherwise because nothing you have to say about me can be supported or substantiated by any true evidence and is being put forth completely out of self preservation and retaliation. Nothing you have to say about me includes a single shred of any attempt at due process.

Partial Transcript of an active,
corporate government sponsored hostage situation

“Let’s do the FTM now while we have everybody…

View original post 1,824 more words

PUBLIC NOTICE
Upon Information received this morning, the Michigan State Police are believed to be getting ready to make a move against me again. Not sure exactly what this may entail however it is expected that their move will involve the unlawful seizure of myself and my personal property, namely my computer systems and my electronic media on some sort of trumped up criminal allegations. The website http://www.Visner4Sheriff.com is currently down for unknown reasons.

All of this because my family’s home and it’s contents at 829 E Walton Rd in Mount Pleasant Michigan were stolen by the Isabella County Sheriff Department on September 27, 2010 and the alleged chief judge in this county would not allow 1st Amendment Redress where the accused were the same county officials that were the friends and coworkers of the same other county officials. (According to Melody Lake on my YouTube channel, claim to be… “the rest of society”)

It must be known that I am completely not violent nor am I suicidal. I am also not affiliated with any extremest groups or religious groups. I do not care about international issues and I am only concerned with the rectification of our county and state units of government.

I have discovered, proven and published that the Michigan State Supreme Court is and has been intentionally and willfully complicate in the unlawful establishment of jurisdiction and criminally maintaining jurisdiction over children residing in Michigan through the intentional conspired deprivation of 4th and 14th Amendment rights of Respondent Parents in CPS cases.

I have discovered, proven and published the fact that the Michigan Supreme Court is complicate in the willful violation of the separation of powers provisions of the state and federal constitutions by creating it’s own legislation enforced upon the people of Michigan through the Michigan Court Rules.

I have captured alleged county court judicial officer Mark Duthie lying on the court record and exposed him only to see the chief judicial terrorist Paul Chamberlain create an administrative rule (meant only for court officers) and exclude court officers from the rule while threatening to enforce the rule on the people of the state of Michigan by threat of fine and imprisonment, legislating from the bench.

It is for this and similar other reasons that I am being personally retaliated against by the criminal elements existing in our government units that include the Isabella County Sheriff Department, the FBI and the Michigan State Police.

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/may042013/visner-michigan-tk.php

It is very important to understand that the courts are unlawfully taking jurisdiction by combining the adjudication phase with the dispositional phase of the proceedings against respondent parents by intentionally averting due process requirements all together and labeling all parents “unfit”.

What this means is that your participation in the proceedings is forgiving them for their having completely violated you at the onset of the proceedings by denying you your due process rights. [Due Process rights are inalienable rights meaning they can not be waived nor given away EVER]

This also means that the proceedings against respondent parents are completely VOID from the beginning.

This perfect defense is not being used by ANY court appointed attorney and is also avoided by almost every paid attorney. Instead, these attorneys keep the fight alive as long as they can because they are greedy and selfish. The quickest way to assess your lawyer’s willingness to help you would be to ask them this question. “Would you be willing to immediately object to the Due Process violations in my case?” If their answer is “NO”, then you need to drop that lawyer immediately and forward a complaint to your local Attorney Grievance Commission. [your lawyer is demonstrating the “Ineffective Assistance of Counsel”]

What I am finding is that every CPS/DHS case against Respondent Parents begins with the immediate assignment of a court appointed attorney that is unwilling to object to Notice Defects and that this action locks the parent in the proceedings against them that are stealing their children.

if your due process rights have been violated…
FIRE YOUR LAWYER AND OBJECT TO THE NOTICE DEFECTS AND THIS ERASES THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN FROM THEIR EVIL INCEPTION!

You have to know however that these criminals are and have for decades been maintaining this criminal empire and that your declaration that the proceedings are a nullity from the beginning puts the blame directly upon them for having taken your children unlawfully [kidnapping] and that they will resist and ignore what you have done. These criminals will act as though you are crazy and they will do it collectively as a team to pressure you into compliance with their crimes.

Suits at law do not exist without proper lawful notice to all of the parties. If you will notice on your “order” following the petition hearing, their is a check box that claims that the parties were noticed as required by law. This is generally near the top because this requirement, if not met, is completely fatal to the proceedings against you! In Michigan, this box is checked regardless of it’s truth.

Scanned Retina - A Resource for the People!

On May 5, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Theodore Visner <ted@visner4sheriff.com> wrote:

Speaking to the current and intentional state of our Michigan courts.

Stating that our courts are “CORRUPT” is incredibly insufficient. The identification and exploitation of

criminal intent is required to establish a basis for meaningful and lasting change.

In “Child Protective Proceedings” (CPS Cases), the Michigan Supreme Court has built a provision into the

Michigan Court Rules that serves to save lower courts from wanton Due Process violations with regard to

Respondent Parents. The specific court rule is MCR 3.920(H).

This Michigan Court Rule allows the court, the prosecutors, public defenders and agencies such as CPS

and DHS to rely on the ability to unlawfully establish jurisdiction without proper lawful notice to the

parties which is a terminal defect to the proceedings themselves.

MCR 3.920(H) Notice Defects. The appearance and participation of a party at a hearing is…

View original post 651 more words

Speaking to the current and intentional state of our Michigan courts.

My_001

Stating that our courts are “CORRUPT” is incredibly insufficient. The identification and exploitation of criminal intent is required to establish a basis for meaningful and lasting change.

In “Child Protective Proceedings” (CPS Cases), the Michigan Supreme Court has built a provision into the Michigan Court Rules that serves to save lower courts from wanton Due Process violations with regard to Respondent Parents. The specific court rule is MCR 3.920(H).

This Michigan Court Rule allows the court, the prosecutors, public defenders and agencies such as CPS and DHS to rely on the ability to unlawfully establish jurisdiction without proper lawful notice to the parties which is a terminal defect to the proceedings themselves.

This “Michigan Court Rule” is being intentionally and preemptively relied upon by the courts, county prosecutors and DHS and CPS to intentionally forego and unconstitutionally eliminate all Due Process requirements to all Respondent Parents in Michigan.

MCR 3.920(H) Notice Defects. The appearance and participation of a party at a hearing is a waiver by that party of defects in service with respect to that hearing unless objections regarding the specific defect are placed on the record. If a party appears or participates without an attorney, the court shall advise the party that the appearance and participation waives notice defects and of the party’s right to seek an attorney.”

This alleged Michigan Court Rule is completely unconstitutional on it’s face! If you come to court seeking the return of your kidnapped children you are appearing and participating in the proceedings against you and now it doesn’t matter that the courts have already deprived you of your inalienable right to due process and you are forever stuck in a jurisdiction unlawfully obtained and criminally maintained!

Through the “creation” of this Michigan Court Rule by the Michigan Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court is intentionally complicate in the conspired deprivation of our inalienable right to Due Process under color of law (A Federal Crime). A right that can NOT be waived.

The Michigan Supreme Court is without virtue and without honor.

When you combine this with the fact that Respondent Parents in Michigan are assigned a “Court Appointed Attorney” before these respondent parents are even aware of the fact that they may need representation we come full circle with a strategy that places the state in the winners bracket every single time in cases involving children. “They can NOT lose”.

Court Appointed Attorneys are assigned by order of the court. How is it that court appointed attorneys are being appointed before the proceedings have begun? Who is appointing these “Court Appointed Attorneys” without asking the Respondent Parent if they require a court appointed attorney?

Respondent Parents in Michigan (as well as many other states) are being assigned representation without ever having made a request for an attorney in violation of Michigan Court Rule MCR 3.915(B)(1)(b).

MCR 3.915 Assistance of Attorney
(B) Child Protective Proceedings.
(1) Respondent.
(b) Appointment of an Attorney. The court shall appoint an attorney to represent the respondent at any hearing, including the preliminary hearing, conducted pursuant to these rules if

(i) the respondent requests appointment of an attorney, and

(ii) it appears to the court, following an examination of the record, through written financial statements, or otherwise, that the respondent is financially unable to retain an attorney.

(c) The respondent may waive the right to the assistance of an attorney,

Additionally, the forced appointment of a court appointed attorney is in direct violation of Article 1 § 13 of the Michigan Constitution which reaffirms the people’s right to represent themselves and/or to seek counsel of their choosing.

Article 1 § 13                                                                                                  § 13 Conduct of suits in person or by counsel.
Sec. 13. A suitor in any court of this state has the right to prosecute or defend his suit, either in his own proper person or by an attorney.

When the court forces the appointment of attorneys that refuse to object to terminal defects in the case, the case is allowed to continue due to MCR 3.920(H) and every BAR member gets paid and Michigan parents are deprived, the state of Michigan is deprived and our nation in general is deprived.

This is the opposite of justice and it is being perpetrated by the entity masquerading as our “judiciary”.

 

michigan supreme court_002

Speaking to the current and intentional state of our Michigan courts.

Stating that our courts are “CORRUPT” is incredibly insufficient. The identification and exploitation of criminal intent is required to establish a basis for meaningful and lasting change.

In “Child Protective Proceedings” (CPS Cases), the Michigan Supreme Court has built a provision into the Michigan Court Rules that serves to save lower courts from wanton Due Process violations with regard to Respondent Parents. The specific court rule is MCR 3.920(H).

This Michigan Court Rule allows the court, the prosecutors, public defenders and agencies such as CPS and DHS to rely on the ability to unlawfully establish jurisdiction without proper lawful notice to the parties which is a terminal defect to the proceedings themselves.

MCR 3.920(H) Notice Defects. The appearance and participation of a party at a hearing is a waiver by that party of defects in service with respect to that hearing unless objections regarding the specific defect are placed on the record. If a party appears or participates without an attorney, the court shall advise the party that the appearance and participation waives notice defects and of the party’s right to seek an attorney.

This alleged Michigan Court Rule is completely unconstitutional on it’s face! If you come to court seeking the return of your kidnapped children you are appearing and participating in the proceedings against you and now it doesn’t matter that the courts have already deprived you of your inalienable right to due process and you are forever stuck in a jurisdiction unlawfully obtained and criminally maintained!

Through the “creation” of this Michigan Court Rule, the Michigan Supreme Court is intentionally complicate in the conspired deprivation of our inalienable right to Due Process under color of law.

The Michigan Supreme Court is without virtue and without honor.

When you combine this with the fact that Respondent Parents in Michigan are assigned a “Court Appointed Attorney”  before these respondent parents are even aware of the fact that they may need representation we come full circle with a strategy that places the state in the winners bracket every single time in cases involving children. “They can NOT lose”.

Court Appointed Attorneys are assigned by order of the court. How is it that court appointed attorneys are being appointed before the proceedings have begun? Who is appointing these “Court Appointed Attorneys” without asking the Respondent Parent if they require a court appointed attorney?

Respondent Parents in Michigan (as well as many other states) are being assigned representation without ever having made a request for an attorney in violation of Michigan Court Rule MCR 3.915(B)(1)(b).

MCR 3.915 Assistance of Attorney

        (B) Child Protective Proceedings.

            (1) Respondent.

                (a) Advice and Right to Counsel. At respondent’s first court appearance, the court shall advise the respondent of the right to retain an attorney to represent the respondent at any hearing conducted pursuant to these rules and that

                        (i) the respondent has the right to a court-appointed attorney at any hearing conducted pursuant to these rules, including the preliminary hearing, if the respondent is financially unable to retain an attorney, and,

                        (ii) if the respondent is not represented by an  attorney, the respondent may request a court-appointed attorney at any later hearing.

                (b) Appointment of an Attorney. The court shall appoint an attorney to represent the respondent at any hearing, including the preliminary hearing, conducted pursuant to these rules if

                        (i) the respondent requests appointment of an attorney, and

                        (ii) it appears to the court, following an examination of the record, through written financial statements, or otherwise, that the respondent is financially unable to retain an attorney.

                (c) The respondent may waive the right to the assistance of an attorney, except that the court shall not accept the waiver by a respondent who is a minor when a parent, guardian, legal custodian, or guardian ad litem objects to the waiver.

Additionally, the forced appointment of a court appointed attorney is in direct violation of Article 1 § 13 of the Michigan Constitution which reaffirms the people’s right to represent themselves and/or to seek counsel of their choosing.

§ 13 Conduct of suits in person or by counsel.
Sec. 13. A suitor in any court of this state has the right to prosecute or defend his suit, either in his own
proper person or by an attorney

When the court forces the appointment of attorneys that refuse to object to terminal defects in the case, the case is allowed to continue due to MCR 3.920(H) and every BAR member gets paid and Michigan parents are deprived, the state of Michigan is deprived and our nation in general is deprived.

This is the opposite of justice and it is being perpetrated by the entity masquerading as our “judiciary”.

Scanned Retina - A Resource for the People!

From: Steve Curry <cwheileg@gmail.com>

Subject: Fwd: Michigan Bar

Date: May 4, 2015 at 8:49:00 AM PDT

To: Arnie Rosner <arnie@arnierosner.com>

Cc: Anna von Reitz <avannavon@gmail.com>, 42 Action <support@42action.org>

The pressure is building!!

Thank you, Betty!

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

 

We THE People of Michigan have given notice to the Governor and Michigan Bar of the Peoples grand juries commencing investigations into the corruption and abuses of courts and public offices.

THE People established grand juries in several counties in 2011 – 2012 with published notices. Grand juries are recognized in the Bill of Rights in the Seventh (7th) Amendment and by U.S. Supreme Court rulings, the most robust being U.S. v. Williams (1992). Justice Antoine Scalia, writing for the majority, said, “It belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people…The 7th Amendment demands a functioning…

View original post 185 more words