Speaking to the current and intentional state of our Michigan courts.


Stating that our courts are “CORRUPT” is incredibly insufficient. The identification and exploitation of criminal intent is required to establish a basis for meaningful and lasting change.

In “Child Protective Proceedings” (CPS Cases), the Michigan Supreme Court has built a provision into the Michigan Court Rules that serves to save lower courts from wanton Due Process violations with regard to Respondent Parents. The specific court rule is MCR 3.920(H).

This Michigan Court Rule allows the court, the prosecutors, public defenders and agencies such as CPS and DHS to rely on the ability to unlawfully establish jurisdiction without proper lawful notice to the parties which is a terminal defect to the proceedings themselves.

This “Michigan Court Rule” is being intentionally and preemptively relied upon by the courts, county prosecutors and DHS and CPS to intentionally forego and unconstitutionally eliminate all Due Process requirements to all Respondent Parents in Michigan.

MCR 3.920(H) Notice Defects. The appearance and participation of a party at a hearing is a waiver by that party of defects in service with respect to that hearing unless objections regarding the specific defect are placed on the record. If a party appears or participates without an attorney, the court shall advise the party that the appearance and participation waives notice defects and of the party’s right to seek an attorney.”

This alleged Michigan Court Rule is completely unconstitutional on it’s face! If you come to court seeking the return of your kidnapped children you are appearing and participating in the proceedings against you and now it doesn’t matter that the courts have already deprived you of your inalienable right to due process and you are forever stuck in a jurisdiction unlawfully obtained and criminally maintained!

Through the “creation” of this Michigan Court Rule by the Michigan Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court is intentionally complicate in the conspired deprivation of our inalienable right to Due Process under color of law (A Federal Crime). A right that can NOT be waived.

The Michigan Supreme Court is without virtue and without honor.

When you combine this with the fact that Respondent Parents in Michigan are assigned a “Court Appointed Attorney” before these respondent parents are even aware of the fact that they may need representation we come full circle with a strategy that places the state in the winners bracket every single time in cases involving children. “They can NOT lose”.

Court Appointed Attorneys are assigned by order of the court. How is it that court appointed attorneys are being appointed before the proceedings have begun? Who is appointing these “Court Appointed Attorneys” without asking the Respondent Parent if they require a court appointed attorney?

Respondent Parents in Michigan (as well as many other states) are being assigned representation without ever having made a request for an attorney in violation of Michigan Court Rule MCR 3.915(B)(1)(b).

MCR 3.915 Assistance of Attorney
(B) Child Protective Proceedings.
(1) Respondent.
(b) Appointment of an Attorney. The court shall appoint an attorney to represent the respondent at any hearing, including the preliminary hearing, conducted pursuant to these rules if

(i) the respondent requests appointment of an attorney, and

(ii) it appears to the court, following an examination of the record, through written financial statements, or otherwise, that the respondent is financially unable to retain an attorney.

(c) The respondent may waive the right to the assistance of an attorney,

Additionally, the forced appointment of a court appointed attorney is in direct violation of Article 1 § 13 of the Michigan Constitution which reaffirms the people’s right to represent themselves and/or to seek counsel of their choosing.

Article 1 § 13                                                                                                  § 13 Conduct of suits in person or by counsel.
Sec. 13. A suitor in any court of this state has the right to prosecute or defend his suit, either in his own proper person or by an attorney.

When the court forces the appointment of attorneys that refuse to object to terminal defects in the case, the case is allowed to continue due to MCR 3.920(H) and every BAR member gets paid and Michigan parents are deprived, the state of Michigan is deprived and our nation in general is deprived.

This is the opposite of justice and it is being perpetrated by the entity masquerading as our “judiciary”.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s